The Hidden Message in My Son's Soccer Contract
- Angela Blomquist
- Jul 31
- 2 min read
Updated: Sep 4

"Real self-discipline is difficult for ordinary people, most people would rather be comfortable than be the best."
This sentence appeared in my 16-year-old son's soccer player agreement. Not some motivational poster hanging in a gym—buried in a sports contract that most families probably just croll to the bottom of and sign without much thought. Yet it's essentially asking teenagers and parents to commit to a philosophy that most adults struggle with daily!
How many players and parents skim right past this statement without recognizing just how powerful it is? Especially for teenagers who are still figuring out their relationship with effort, sacrifice, and what they actually want to pursue in life.
Sports offer something unique: they're one of the few places where young people can experience what choosing "discomfort for excellence" feels like in real time. The burning legs during conditioning, getting up early for practice, playing through minor injuries, dealing with coaching criticism—the feedback is immediate and visible. You either make the team or you don't. You win or you lose. However, what does "best" actually mean? Best at what? For whom? The person giving their company/firm 80-hour weeks to become the top performer might be sacrificing other forms of excellence—as a parent, friend, or simply someone who knows how to enjoy life.
There's definitely tension between the immediate comfort of familiar routines and the discomfort that comes with pushing toward something different—something out of the ordinary. Staying in familiar patterns feels safe and requires less mental effort than constantly challenging ourselves. Most people have genuine responsibilities, constraints, and limited energy that make the comfortable path not just appealing, but sometimes necessary.
I think the relationship between staying in our comfort zone and expanding it for growth and authentic connection to ourselves is more nuanced than a simple either/or choice.
In daily life, the consequences of choosing comfort over growth are often delayed and harder to see. We can coast in relationships for years before realizing we've grown apart. We can stay in jobs that don't challenge us without immediate penalty. We can avoid difficult conversations, skip the workout, choose the easier path—and nothing dramatic happens right away.
The reality is that most of us have built lives that are genuinely good enough. We're not in crisis. We're not failing dramatically. We're just... not becoming who we could be. And that's a much subtler form of suffering than the clear discomfort of pushing ourselves.
This is where that soccer contract becomes profound. It's not asking for superhuman effort—it's asking us to acknowledge a fundamental choice we make every single day.
Perhaps the key is reframing what comfortable actually costs us. When we choose the familiar or "good enough" over the challenging, we're not just missing out on achievement or fulfillment—we're leaving a deeper sense of who we really want to be on the table. That misalignment creates its own kind of discomfort: the slow-burn kind that's easy to rationalize and make excuses for. Maybe the real discipline isn't just about doing hard things, but about regularly examining whether our current comfortable patterns still serve us. And if they don't, asking ourselves the tough question: How hard are we willing to work for different versions of our "best" selves?





Comments